Wednesday, 28 November 2018

Business and Human Rights in Verse: Poem 2

This is the second of three attempts to approach 'business and human rights' slightly differently (for a law academic), in verse. The first attempt (previous post) was 'Big Data'. The third attempt (next week's post) is 'Extractive'.

‘Dance the Guns to Silence’: some Business and Human Rights in verse

Dr Jolyon Ford
Associate Professor of Law, Australian National University
November 2018
                                                                                                                                  
II.

Supply Chain

In these rooms where dull heat squats,
We sprawl and watch the shared screen flicker
Scenes from your world, worlds apart:
Track the thin truth that ties us together.

Do you ever just lie awake at night
And feel the ways our lives are close?
What becomes of the traces of our sweat,
In that bright world the camera shows?

What scent of humanity lingers there,
(It is a small world, after all)?
Persistent and intimate, perhaps we share
A story or secret, something small.

Bits of you come to us in waves,
Lying here watching the things you do.
Yet traces of me linger in your days,
Woven in the things we make for you.

I wake unrested and wait to wash,
We cannot leave this place.
Too tired to care where all this goes,
To think of blame, or of consequence.

You are still out there somewhere, doing
Whatever it is People do with Life.
The myriad things that fill your days
Tease our dreams through hot still nights.
The thread that weaves us does not bind,
The link does not connect;
The traces of me in space and time,
The little hope that’s left.

Stains in the hidden lining remain,
Shame too abstract to make a mark.
Something too faint to keep you awake,
Weeps unheard in this squalid dark.

The folly of our tele-dream:
To think we thought you somehow near.
For your Things we gave our self-esteem,
For such a small world, truly far.
                                                                                                     Singapore, 13 October 2018

Friday, 23 November 2018

Business and Human Rights in Verse: Poem I

This is the first of 3 efforts to approach 'business and human rights' issues in another way. Poem 1 is entitled 'Big Data'; Poem 2 'Supply Chain' and Poem 3 'Extractive':


‘Dance the Guns to Silence’: some Business and Human Rights in verse

Dr Jolyon Ford
Associate Professor of Law, Australian National University
                                                                                                                                                November 2018


I.

Big Data

Auden felt it years ago,
His senses taut and pricked with light:
The gloom that gathers when we know
We cannot know truth, or wrong from right.
Aggregate my many selves,
Average out my patterned moves;
Analyze my weakest points,
Accept the truth that the Data proves.

You are more than just the sum
Of your coded self, something more
Than the image that the moment holds.
When this drops in and tells you things
You did not know about your life,
Remember that we yearned for this;
Accept the truth that the Profile tells;
Know that if blame is even worth it now,
In truth we did this to ourselves.

                                                                                                                                 Canberra, 10 October 2018

Wednesday, 7 November 2018

Who is 'business and human rights' for?

Who are those doing 'business and human rights' (BHR) stuff, and for whom are they doing these things?

This post offers two reflections on the BHR 'movement'.

(I'm conscious that I'm at risk of over-thinking things about the BHR movement or 'field'. Examples of this include posts asking 'has BHR lost its way?' or one reflecting on what the field itself comprises.)

The first reflection I've used since 2016 in my Masters (LLM) course in BHR, to stimulate student thinking. It might be framed as who 'does' BHR?

The second reflection is one I offered at a recent talk at ANU's RegNet, my doctoral alma mater. It might be framed as who is BHR for?

Who 'does' BHR?

Many students study human rights with a view to 'making a difference'. Most of my students accordingly focus on classic public law and public international law subjects.

Yet -- and this is what I leave my students with each course-end -- perhaps the most effective BHR lawyers of the future will not be steeped in conventional human rights skills and knowledge. They will be people who understand contract law, corporate law, fiduciary duties of institutional investors, international trade and investment law and negotiations... they will also be students who have grasped that understanding the significance of local political economy dynamics is as important as fluency in the UN Guiding Principles on BHR: law and power, law as power.

BHR could do with more reflection, for example, on expertise, who is doing it, on how 'power law and expertise shape the global political economy' in a David Kennedy (2016) sense.

Many activists (and academics) in this field appear not only not to understand business or corporations, they sometimes seem not to want to understand them. Business and investment is something that happens out there, by some people who are probably not as nice or worldly as us.... Yet one has to question BHR strategies grounded in knee-jerk distaste for the very entities that one needs to understand (and sometimes engage with!) in order to transform problematic patterns.

Who is BHR 'for'?

Two of the BHR topics that perhaps dominate in Australia at present are (i) data, new technology and human rights; and (ii) corporate action on human rights risks in the supply chain under the intended Modern Slavery Act.

Both are important, complex, etc. Yet both, in different ways, have the effect of focusing very much on 'us' (in the first world) rather than 'them' (places where the aggregate of serious, systemic adverse BHR impacts occur).

Take the supply chains focus, which is one I'm part of. (An earlier post linked above noted that BHR is about a lot more than just 'modern slavery', as current and important and hard as that problem is).

There is a possible critique that the orientation of our current 'modern slavery' enquiries is parochial or inward looking. Its dominant vein is as follows: we must act to ensure we -- and our jurisdiction, our supermarket shelves, our wardrobes -- are not 'tainted' by association with modern slavery risk. That is not the same as saying 'we must tackle this phenomenon wherever it occurs'.

Have we succeeded if, through altered purchasing and procurement patterns (etc.) we rid Australia of any tainting trace of modern slavery, even if the phenomenon is alive and well in our region?

At least on Modern Slavery Act matters, is BHR as a movement (and so to a degree BHR scholarship) at risk of framing things as 'what can we do to rid ourselves of this human stain?' rather than 'what raft of measures will best address this topic in its own right?', that is, what works irrespective of how it affects our space?

This second reflection might be viewed as a bit unfair. After all, we (in Australia) are simply looking for ways, within our sphere of influence (so to speak), to address a global problem. And it is natural for analysis to 'begin at home' and focus on such issues. Still, its just a reflection.

Jo